GrabCAD Community User Group

It's a ridicolous and an oscenous way to share own works!!!!

Whenever I post a photograph it is to show that after design and modeling, I actually built and tested the equipment. For example my Gantry Crane: https://grabcad.com/library/gantry-crane-portable-with-tool-less-assembly-and-adjustable-length-lifting-capacity-1

Pretty much everything I design, I build because it is something I need. Plus I like others who may wish to have one to know it works and is safe.

Well it worked for him! he has more then 100 likes on a model that I would not say rates that many ;)

I love to see photos of projects that people have built. The example Rollin posted is a great example. I doubt anyone would mistake the photos of the Gantry Crane with a rendering.

In other cases, the difference between a photo, and a photo realistic rendering are difficult or impossible to discern.

As Stephen points out, uploading a nice photo on a bad model is an easier path to likes, and the Popular Models Page.

I think sometimes the goal is to mislead people with the photos. Other times it may be unintentional, and the uploader is posting the best image they can if they are bad at, or unable to produce a rendering.

Here are two concerns I have:

1. If the practice of using photos goes on without complaint, the problem will likely get worse. Some new, and existing members will opt to post photos to the library. Why take the time to render when a photo is easier?
2. Great models which deserve to be on the main library page are bumped off for less worthy models represented by photos.

I'd prefer to see, and be inspired by great models/renders on GrabCAD. If I am looking for photos, I'll stick with a Google Image search.

I agree that this seems to be an issue. I think we might be better off requiring either a render or just a screenshot of the model be the first photo visible. Then the photos of the actual product can be added later in the list of uploaded pictures. That way there's no confusion in what you may be downloading. Another option might be the requirement of downloading the model before 'liking' it, although with all of the various programs used that's probably more hassle than it's worth.

I use to give NO LIKE to any weapon ever! There are so many lovely things to model and to render... Why weapons?

I have no objection to weapons, but to each their own. My complaint was the use of photographs in the library (in place of screenshots, or renderings).

Regarding weapons, nearly anything from a rock, a foot, pencil, knife, stick, vase, hammer, screwdriver, vehicle, or firearm can be used as a weapon.

The problem does not lie with the item, but in how it is used.

Hey everyone! Matt from GrabCAD weighing in. I agree that we should do more to enforce this "no photograph" or " no non-representative renderings" rule. I'll work on that in the future.

When reported, we already take action against copyright violations and inappropriate models (sexually explicit, firearm models that actually work when 3D printed). We have chosen not to take the extreme measure of removing all firearm models from GrabCAD, as firearms are impressive engineering feats, and for some, they are a lifelong hobby and passion. But we require that these be non-functional, and it's on the uploader to provide proof that this cannot be used as an actual weapon.

If you see something, say something! Please report any violations of our Community Values & Guidelines, and I will look into the situation. Thanks for being a part of the GrabCAD Community!

A few new examples which are funny, and are an interesting way of skirting a no photos in the library rule.

What do you get when you use a photograph as the backplate of a rendering, then add in your rendered image so it takes up about 10% (or less) of the screen space?

Check these out for a chuckle. CAN is my favorite, but 7TP1A is cool, it is a bit like playing Where's Waldo :)

Grabcad model

CAN

ENERGY DRINK

Grabcad model

7TP1A

SECURITY AND CLEANING

Grabcad model

HYDRAULIC JACK

BEST IN PERFORMANCE.

Grabcad model

STOOL

PLASTIC FURNITURE

I can't find the guideline, but I think it says something like "firearm models are allowed if they are non-functional".

The majority of firearm models on GrabCAD are items that look like guns. It is a lot like the car models on the site. Yes, it looks like a car, but it does not function, nor can it be made to function without a lot of design, engineering, and manufacturing expertise. Otherwise it is a pretty rendering, or a 3D printed item which sits on a shelf.

Consider this text from Wikipedia:

Any object designed, made, or adapted for the purposes of inflicting death or serious physical injury can be considered a deadly weapon.

For example, a shoe or a shod foot used for kicking may be considered a dangerous weapon. A Florida man was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon after throwing a live alligator through the open drive-through window of a fast food restaurant. In Texas a grand jury decided that a flashing GIF, intended to provoke an epileptic seizure resulting in death, can be considered as a deadly weapon.

Shoes, cars, firearms, clubs (golf, baseball, field hockey...etc.), tools, rocks... Everything can be made into a weapon. If GrabCAD decides to remove "dangerous models", we are going to have a sparse library.

A GIF was considered a deadly weapon! As the user with the best, and likely most numerous animated gifs on the site, you might be at risk. No telling when someone will weaponize one of those beauties ;)

I find it very annoying people passing off photographs as renders, then you look at the model and it isn’t even accurate. Lots of thumbs up for these, so I only assume a lot of people on here with no design skills or eye for detail. I am never sure if it is wise to challenge some of the authors.

https://grabcad.com/hamed.mosay-1

This guy caught my attention, but a lot of others too.

I think this is not only photos but youtube links with NO referance to a model in Grabcad.

What do the links go to on Youtube? Something like a tutorial? Their blog?

I usually don't bother clicking any Youtube links on models so I've not seen this.

Yes. Please report models like this.

I just went through their uploads and 90% of the images are taken from online sources.

I reported a bunch of the models.

I left a comment on the models where I found duplicates of the online images:

Kind of a result Hamed has removed all his models, shame in one sense. If he hadn't tried to fob them off with stock photo's as renders he would have gained more respect for the models he may have drawn.