The ambiguity of GRABCAD's preconditions for awards & terms is one of the ongoing frustrations I find and as it seems also per YTK's many enquiries into different matters.
GRABCAD has said that it is revamping the Badge awards infrastructure but that was mentioned quite a few months ago with no real update or when it will be rolling it out . I do not know if guidance has been left vague for flexibility or to prevent manipulation for dishonest gain. Whatever reason, it is not working.
I believe Render King award is for over 100 renderings of your own model and not limited to 1 render per model (I have the badge but only 63 models though I have provided more than 1 render per model).
The Share Master Badge I believe will be for 100 uploaded models. I myself do not have the badge though I have over 11,780 downloads but then only 63 models.
One other issue not really taken into account is quantity over quality. Certain models are a compilation of multitude of parts. Some of these parts are quite intricate & would constitute a singular status of their own. Maybe models could be given a rating reflecting on CAD Skills, Intricacy, size and scope.
Certain inequities are in the present badge / award / point systems and it is hoped that GRABCAD can attend to it at their earliest convenience in true service to contributing GRABCAD'rs. Once again making it more transparent for working to goals as well as rewarding contributors and chastening those who abuse the good nature of the site.
There is quite a disparity between contributors and those that take with nothing given in return. This can be seen in the number of downloads against the LIKES given to a model, as well as pirated models. It is hoped that GRABCAD will do what it can to protect those against the unscrupulous and reward those that make the site what it is and encourage all to contribute to for every ones benefit.
Regards: Mark Bruton